Archive for August, 2010

[Approx. Read Time: 2 minutes]

In what is being viewed as a landmark demonstration of public support among the scientific community, the President of the Virginia Health Physics Society officially endorsed efforts to mine uranium in Virginia in an Op Ed in the Chatham Star Tribune.

 

The Health Physics Society is an organization of nearly 6,000 scientific professionals from across the country that strives to promote best practices in radiation safety.

Carter Ficklen, the President of the organization’s Virginia chapter is a retired health physicist who worked for more than 10 years at NASA’s Langley Research Center in Hampton and spent the last 18 years of his career at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Thomas Jefferson Lab in Newport News.

 

“It is the position of the Virginia Chapter of the Health Physics Society”, Mr. Fecklin writes in the Op Ed, “that uranium mining in the Commonwealth of Virginia can and should be pursued.”  “The proposed mining endeavors,” he continued, “can be carried out with minimal impact on the environmental quality of the surrounding areas while simultaneously stimulating the economy of Southside Virginia, filling a vacancy in our country’s energy needs, and reducing the United State’s dependency on foreign sources of energy.”

 

The largest untapped uranium deposit in the United States, known as the Coles Hill deposit, is located in Southside Virginia’s Pittsylvania County. The deposit, a veritable mother lode of nuclear energy, contains enough uranium to fuel Virginia’s entire nuclear energy demand at current levels for more than 65 years, and America’s for more than 2 years. Yet, a 25-year-old moratorium on uranium mining in the Commonwealth stands in the way of its development.

 

The General Assembly is waiting for the results of an independent study by the National Academy of Sciences on the public health and environmental impact before determining whether to lift the moratorium and promulgate the necessary regulations and permitting to allow the development to proceed.

 

A 1984 independent study commissioned by the Virginia Coal and Energy Commission determined that the Coles Hill deposit could be mined safely and without serious risks to the environment.

 

Concerns about the safety of uranium mining are based on “misinformation and misperceptions,” says Mr. Ficklen. In an effort to allay some of those concerns, Mr. Ficklen outlines the stringent regulatory structure that governs mining operations in the U.S. The Environmental Protection Agency’s rigorous standards for water quality protect public water sources from contamination, and the tight regulation of mine tailings - the waste rock left over after mining is complete - by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission prevents the infiltration of radiation into the air, water and agriculture surrounding mining operations.

 

Mr. Ficklen illustrates the significant economic impact the project would entail for the economically distressed Southside region - 300-350 permanent jobs, as much as $300 million in annual economic impact and millions of dollars in local tax revenue each year.

 

Mr. Ficklen also argues that it is imperative to develop Virginia’s abundant uranium resources in order to reduce America’s dependence on foreign sources of uranium and to fuel the vast expansion of electricity output that is expected in the coming decades. America currently imports 86% of our uranium from foreign countries, with roughly half purchased from state-run nuclear companies in Russia, Kazakhstan, Namibia and Uzbekistan.

 

“The global demand for electricity is increasing at a fast pace with the overall world generation of electricity expected to increase by 60 percent between now and 2030,” Ficklen said.

 

“These increases can be achieved only by the rapid construction of new generating stations, and a significant number of these new stations will be nuclear plants fueled with uranium. To support the growing dependence on nuclear power, the uranium mining industry must significantly increase its annual production and processing of uranium ore.”


Aaron Ruby is a representative of the Virginia Energy Independence Alliance (VEIA), a grassroots coalition of nearly 1,000 Virginians that promotes the development of Virginia’s abundant energy resources as a solution to America’s dependence on foreign energy and as an engine for job creation and economic revitalization across Virginia. In particular, the VEIA promotes harnessing Virginia’s vast nuclear resources - from the Coles Hill uranium deposit in Southside to the expansion of North Anna power station in Central Virginia and nuclear components manufacturing in Newport News - to spread economic development and advance energy independence.

Women in Nuclear Conference: Seattle 2010

Posted by Lakshmi Pendyala On August - 24 - 2010

[Approx. Read Time: 2.5 minutes]

“Powering the Network” was the goal of the 2010 WIN Conference and it couldn’t have been better achieved with 381 Women in Nuclear joining hands to share the energy industry knowledge and promote mutual growth.
 
Describing my experience at the meeting this year in one word, I would say that it was “Empowering”!

WiN Seattle 2010

WiN Seattle 2010

The conference kicked off with a welcome address by Carol Berrigan, Senior Director, Industry Infrastructure, and Dale Atkinson Vice President, Operational Support, Energy Northwest, followed by an awesome line of speeches which kept the audience motivated throughout the conference by their highly spirited discussions on a myriad of topics. Balancing the Energy, Issues in Isotope Production and Use, Challenges in the Front End of the Fuel Cycle, and New Plant Construction are just a few to mention!

Specific attention was given to Professional Development in the form of work shops on Solving Problems-Leveraging Organizations, Soft Skills and Hard Lessons for Women Leaders. The conference also offered a unique mentorship program to aid first time attendees in navigating the conference and the U.S. Women in Nuclear experience. Forty industry professionals who have attended at least one previous U.S. WIN conference volunteered for the program and made themselves available to mentor students. They also helped the students to network and build contacts, shared their knowledge and experience and supported them throughout the conference.

WiN Seattle 2010

AREVA Attendees

The best was saved for last! The attendees’ experience reached its pinnacle on the last day when they toured Columbia Generating Station and U.S. Nuclear Submarine and Trident Training Facility (TTF).

The tour provided by the United States Navy was an exclusive tour of the one of America’s Ohio Class Ballistic Missile Submarines and Trident Training Facility. The attendees spent the morning touring the TTF where submarine crews use simulators to train for real world events, ranging from casualty responses to wartime scenarios.  It was a once in a lifetime tour of one of the most high-tech and sophisticated submarines in the world. 

The batch that chose to tour Columbia Generating Station had a unique experience of visiting the only commercially operated nuclear power plant in the Northwest. The boiling water reactor has an on-site dry cask storage installation, which allows for storage of spent fuel rods in specially designed and manufactured casks. To date, 27 casks have been loaded and stored in the new installation, making room in the spent fuel pool for receipt of new fuel. (Not to mention the pleasure of going on a magical journey riding through the gorges with spectacular views of snow covered mountains and idyllic lakes unique to the state of Washington)

I asked a few of my co-attendees to share the most important skill that they learned, or learned to improve, at the WiN Conference and here is what they had to say:

Rebecca Jetton:

“The WiN national conference is a great opportunity to expand my knowledge of parts of the nuclear field that are outside of my day to day job. I enjoy learning about different aspects of nuclear power from experts in the field.

The conference is also a great chance to network and exchange ideas with other women in the nuclear field and to develop my personal leadership skills.”

Wanda Brookscrocker:

“The thing that most inspires me at the conferences is the networking that occurs, realizing that this is how things get done and definitely how nuclear is regaining popularity in the U.S. - people connecting with others in the industry and standing together in support of nuclear energy.  The opportunity to mentor, too, is very valuable.  As a mentor for the second time, I realized that I benefited as much from the experience as the students I mentored.  On-going contacts were made with several people in the educational sector.  These contacts help the students to realize the value of becoming involved in the industry.”

 Becky Rollins:

“One of the most important things I learned at the WIN conference was you are responsible for where you want to be in your career.  You have to ask for what you want, have a good support structure, push the envelope, understand your gaps and work to close them, and set challenging goals for yourself.”

Danita Lampkin:

“The WiN conference taught me how to reform myths and help improve the image of nuclear engineering. Through this conference I was able to gain some insight on public perception of the nuclear industry in the media.”

 

Nuclear Deserves Role Among NC’s Diverse Energy Sources

Posted by Andrew On August - 19 - 2010

[Approx. Read Time: 3 minutes]

energyportfolioThere has been a strong push in recent years to reduce or regulate greenhouse gas emissions with fossil fueled power plants being the biggest contributors of carbon dioxide in the US. Pending US legislation and public desire to be more eco-friendly, renewables have become the hot ticket item to address this issue. While it would be a wonderful world if all of our electric demands could be met by renewables alone, that is not the case. The wind doesn’t always blow and the sun doesn’t always shine. I agree that we should increase our electricity generation from renewables, but I also think we should increase the electricity generation from nuclear. Of course, it may be impossible to eliminate the need for fossil fuels altogether but a reduction (or at least leveling-off) would be a big step in the right direction.

Although one of the most recognized concerns with nuclear is the wastes it produces, the waste produced by nuclear power plants is condensed and contained within well managed fuel rods whereas fossil fuel power plants release some of their waste into the atmosphere. But why is it a bigger concern to have to dispose of condensed waste, than it is to have to live with the emitted waste? Similar to the way in which nuclear waste is stored, imagine if we could store all of the greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel plants in containers to keep them from harming the environment or even worse our own health. Wouldn’t this be better than letting the emissions go freely into the environment? While methods are being explored to reduce the carbon emissions from fossil fueled plants, nuclear already provides carbon free electricity generation.

Amber Smart provides a good discussion about nuclear in comparison to other sources for electricity generation. While a world free from carbon-free electricity generation cannot be reasonably attained in the near future, nuclear energy is a safe solution which can bring us closer to that goal.

Nuclear Deserves Role Among NC’s Diverse Energy Sources

From Amber Smart of Connelly Springs, a senior nuclear engineering major at N.C. State University who is a summer intern at Duke Energy in Charlotte, NC:

Proponents for nuclear energy in the U.S. acknowledge that a balanced energy portfolio is necessary to be successful in meeting our future energy needs. This includes increasing our use of renewable resources such as wind and solar. While wind and solar must be part of our energy independence, they cannot replace nuclear or coal as a fuel that can provide power 24-7. Renewable sources should be used in addition to, not as replacement of, this generation.

Each type of generation offers advantages. Nuclear energy provides safe, reliable generation with zero carbon emissions [during electricity generation]. Nuclear power plants can operate around the clock and today provide about 34 percent of North Carolina’s electricity. Nuclear plants provide a more steady and reliable power source than any other type of generation. It’s been estimated that a 1,000-megawatt reactor operating at 90 percent reliability in one year can provide enough generation to supply electricity for roughly 740,000 households. The equivalent amount of energy generated from oil would require approximately 13 million barrels.

Diversity in generation offers environmental benefits. Nuclear energy professionals are environmentalists, too. We care about the Earth and the impact we may have on it. In 2009 alone, operation of U.S. nuclear plants prevented emissions of carbon dioxide equivalent to eliminating approximately 125 million passenger cars. The areas around nuclear plants are carefully monitored, including air and water quality analysis, to ensure the least environmental impact. Through safe, quality operations and a focus on environmental protection, nuclear energy is proven as one of the most environmentally sound sources of power.

Fuel supply is also an important consideration in evaluating energy options, whether wind, solar, coal, gas or nuclear. Uranium fuels nuclear plants and is available worldwide. Other countries already recycle used nuclear fuel. When nuclear fuel leaves the reactor, only 1 percent of its potential has been utilized. Today, used fuel is stored safely and securely on plant sites in our country, and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission determined this fuel could be stored on site for at least 120 years. On-site storage was never meant to be a permanent solution, which is why both recycling and centralized storage are under evaluation in the U.S.

Nuclear is a long-term energy resource, not a quick fix. While it does have higher construction costs than some other types of generation, overall operating costs are lower. If the United States is serious about energy security and maintaining our environmental stewardship, we need to welcome new nuclear stations.

With a diverse energy portfolio, the U.S. can be at the forefront of carbon-free electricity generation. Not only is nuclear power a good source of safe, reliable energy, it is also good for North Carolina and its residents. It can ensure our energy future as well as economic development opportunities.

Jobs, Jobs, Jobs

Posted by Michael Bloom On August - 17 - 2010

 [Approx. Read Time: 3 minutes]

“It’s the economy, stupid”, with double digit unemployment, what our economy really needs is jobs.  Nuclear energy provides thousands of Americans with stable high paying jobs.  The article below explains how new graduates from a two year program in Miami are getting great jobs before they even graduate.

Miami Dade College’s Clean Energy Institute graduates get more than a diploma; they also get a job.

It looked like a typical graduation ceremony. But instead of anxiously wondering about finding jobs in the uncertain economy, 22 graduates of the Clean Energy Institute walked across the auditorium stage Wednesday at the Miami Dade College Wolfson campus with letters of employment in hand and white hard hats on their heads.

Thanks to the Clean Energy Institute, a joint program between Miami Dade College and Florida Power & Light, the grads will work as technicians at the Turkey Point Nuclear Power Plant in Homestead with starting salaries of $45,000 or more after two years of college-level study and earning a $7,661 associate of science degree.

Otrebogir Urquiaga was among them. After studying engineering for five years in Cuba, Urquiaga, 39, of Hialeah, restarted his education when he moved to Miami 16 years ago. He took online courses in math and physics before applying to the Clean Energy Institute.

“Graduating from this course, you have a job,” said Urquiaga, whose two sons, 2 and 4, shouted, “Papi” as he crossed the stage. “And that’s great.”

Started in 2006, the institute is designed to educate workers to replace the aging power plant workforce. Over the next five years, 38 percent of U.S. nuclear power plant workers will become eligible for retirement, said Mitch Singer, spokesman for the Nuclear Energy Institute in Washington, D.C.

Under the program, FPL agreed to hire at least 20 Clean Energy Institute graduates annually and promote six internal employees through the program yearly for 10 years, starting with the 2008 grads.

‘A PIPELINE’

“It’s a robust pipeline for highly skilled workers,” said James Auld, college coordinator of the nuclear division at FPL. “We take local individuals, educate them locally and then we hire them locally and they stay long-term with the company.”

The program will expand within five years to include non-licensed operators, or workers who man the controls, in addition to the mechanical, electrical and instrumentation and control skills already taught in the program.

Starting this year, the Clean Energy Institute will give graduates certificates so their work transfers to nuclear power plants beyond South Florida.

Nationwide, more power plant jobs will be created in the next decade. The Obama administration guaranteed $8.33 billion in loans for two new nuclear reactors in Georgia that would create an estimated 800 jobs.

Activists raise questions about potential dangers associated with nuclear power plants, including radiation following an accident.

But the plants don’t emit greenhouse gases, and they account for 70 percent of the U.S.’s non-emitting energy sources, Singer said.

GLAD TO HAVE JOBS

Those concerns weren’t mentioned by Wednesday’s graduates, who were said they were relieved to have jobs as plant technicians.

Urquiaga reaffirmed his career choice after he completed a required five-week internship at the Turkey Point power plant. Despite the intense heat and risks of working in a power plant, he said the internship confirmed “this is where I want to be the rest of my life.” To be admitted, students must pass an aptitude test with a 30 percent pass rate that includes math and spatial reasoning. They can request practice tests from the school. About 120 apply and 40 are admitted yearly, said Richard White, director of the school of computer and engineering technologies.

Of those who graduate, FPL chooses employees based on FBI background checks, grades in classes — such as college algebra and electronics — and how well they perform during hands-on internships at the plant.

HARD WORK PAYS OFF

Elmehdi Elaadil, 21, of Kendall, doubted whether he would get the job because he was fresh out of high school.

But Wednesday, he cradled his hard hat under his arm and celebrated his new job as a mechanical maintenance technician.

“I thought I would never make it,” said Elaadil, who moved to Miami from Casablanca, Morocco, 10 years ago. “But we all studied together at the library almost every day.”

Southern Company’s new units at Plant Vogtle hit a new milestone

Posted by Jana Thames On August - 12 - 2010

IHI ships heavy components for Vogtle project

9 August 2010

Japan’s IHI has started shipping the containment vessel bottom heads for the Vogtle AP1000 in the USA. It is the first time in 30 years that IHI has shipped nuclear power generation machinery to the USA.

IHI was awarded the contract for two containment vessels from CB&I in January 2009. The CVBHs, produced at IHI works in Yokohama, Japan will be delived within five shipments per unit, as separate plate components due to their size.The two steel containment vessels are each more than 40 meters in diameter, over 66 meters high, and approximately 4,000 tons in weight.

The first shipment set sail for the USA on 25 July 2010.

The components will be used at the two-unit Vogtle nuclear power plant planned by Southern Company subsidary Georgia Power. Ownership of the reactors will be split among Georgia Power, Oglethorpe Power Corporation (30%), the Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia (22.7%) and Dalton Utilities (1.6%).

vogtletimeline

Southern Company, DOE agree to conditional nuclear loan guarantee terms

On June 11, 2010, Southern Company and Georgia Power announced an agreement with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) for a conditional commitment for loan guarantees for construction of units 3 and 4 at Plant Vogtle. The loan guarantees would apply to future borrowings related to the construction.

vogtle1

Final approval and issuance of the loan guarantees are subject to receipt of a Combined Operating License from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), completion of final agreements, the receipt of any other required regulatory approvals and satisfaction of other conditions.

Total guaranteed borrowings would not exceed 70 percent of the company’s eligible projected costs of approximately $6.1, or about $3.4 billion.

The DOE loan guarantees are expected to save Georgia Power’s customers millions in financing costs annually over the expected life of any guaranteed borrowings, based on preliminary estimates. The actual amount of the savings will depend upon the final terms and the timing of the specific borrowings.

On behalf of the plant owners, Southern Nuclear filed applications with the NRC for an Early Site Permit (ESP) in 2006 and a Combined Construction and Operating License (COL) in 2008 for new units at the Vogtle site.

In August 2009, Southern Nuclear received the ESP for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. The Vogtle ESP is the first one in the industry to reference a specific technology, Westinghouse AP1000. Additionally, Southern Nuclear’s ESP comes with a Limited Work Authorization (LWA). The LWA allows limited safety-related activities to begin at the site prior to the COL being issued.

An ESP allows the NRC to review and pre-approve the site for construction of new units and allows the company to conduct design, construction and other site-specific evaluations before making a decision to build.

The COL will provide Southern Company with one license to build and operate a nuclear plant based on an NRC pre-approved design at a specific site.

Additionally, the new Vogtle units have received certification from the Georgia Public Service Commission. Georgia Power, a subsidiary of Southern Company, and co-owner of the proposed units, filed an Application for Certification of Vogtle Units 3 and 4 on August 1, 2008. The filing was approved by the Georgia Public Service Commission on March 17, 2009.

vogtle2

 

NA-YGN Straight Talk on Nuclear

Posted by Christine Csizmadia On August - 5 - 2010

The author would like to recognize former NA-YGN Public Information Chair Sarah Leversee as a co-contributor to this effort.

For a link to this document, click here.

[Approx. Read Time: <1 minute]

na-ygn_small

The North American Young Generation in Nuclear (NA-YGN) unites young professionals who believe in nuclear science and technology and are working together throughout North America to share their passion for a field that is alive and kicking!

NA-YGN believes that nuclear energy must be part of our solution for a balanced and secure energy mix.

Nuclear energy is:

Safe and Secure

The nuclear industry’s safety performance is among the best of any energy sector.  Nuclear plants are the most secure industrial facilities, and were so even prior to 9/11.  The industry has invested $2.1 billion above its ongoing security expenses to enhance its security and safety measures [1].

Reliable

Since 1990, commercial U.S. nuclear power plant capacity factors have risen from 66% to nearly 92% in 2007 [2]. When combined with power uprates, this results in an output increase equivalent to adding 29 new 1000-megawatt power plants.

Nuclear power accounts for nearly 20% of all power production in the United States and 16% of all power production in the world [3,4].

Cost Competitive

Since 2006, the average electricity production cost for nuclear power was 1.72 cents per kilowatt-hour, versus 2.37 cents for coal-fired plants, 6.75 cents for gas, and 9.63 cents for petroleum [6].

Nuclear is the only power industry that accounts for all its byproducts and includes in its price the cost of waste management and plant decommissioning.

Clean

Nuclear energy is the world’s largest source of emissions-free energy. It accounts for 74% of emissions-free energy in the United States.

One uranium nuclear fuel pellet the size of the tip of your little finger can produce the equivalent amount of energy provided by 1,780 pounds of coal, 149 gallons of oil, or 17,000 cubic feet of natural gas [5].

Engine for Job Creation

Construction of new reactors will yield an estimated 610,000 jobs in the nuclear industry.  Currently, there are competitive opportunities for technicians, engineers and skilled trade workers ready to be filled [7].

The Future

The Department of Energy projects a 21 % increase in electricity demands by 2030.  The nuclear industry has responded to the demand with 17 applications for 26 new reactors. These are currently being reviewed by the NRC [2].

The federal loan guarantee program is necessary component for building new nuclear power plants.  Loan guarantees give the nuclear industry the financial stability to move forward with hiring and new plant construction.


 1.  Nuclear Energy Institute, Nuclear Power Plant Security, Accessed 31 January 2009 from http://www.nei.org/filefolder/Nuclear_Power_Plant_Security_Feb2008.pdf  
2.  United States Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration,   Accessed 31 January 2009 from http://www.eia.doe.gov/fuelnuclear.html

3.  Nuclear Energy Institute, U.S. Electricity Generation Fuel Shares, Accessed   31 January 2009 from
http://www.nei.org/resourcesandstats/documentlibrary/reliableandaffordableenergy/graphicsandcharts/uselectricitygenerationfuelshares/ 

4.  Nuclear Energy Institute, World Nuclear Power Generation and Capacity.   Accessed 31 January 2009 from http://www.nei.org/resourcesandstats/documentlibrary/reliableandaffordableenergy/graphicsandcharts/worldnucleargenerationandcapacity/   
5.  Nuclear Energy Institute, Emissions Free Sources, Accessed 31 January 2009 from http://www.nei.org/filefolder/Infographic_Emission_Free_Sources_2007.jpg  

6.   Nuclear Energy Institute, U.S. Electricity Production Cost. Accessed 31   January 2009 from http://www.nei.org/filefolder/u.s._electricity_production_costs.ppt

  7.  Clean and Safe Energy Coalition, Job Creation in the Nuclear Renaissance, Accessed 31 January 2009 from http://www.cleansafeenergy.org/LinkClick.aspx?link=CASEnergywForewordpg.6.pdf&tabid=243

Fact Sheet 2010 NEI Quiz