Archive for the ‘Energy Insights’ Category

2011 NA-YGN Drawing Contest Winners Announced

Posted by Andrea Davis On January - 27 - 2012

[Approx. Read Time: 1 minute]

The North American Young Generation in Nuclear (NA-YGN) teamed up with Clean Energy Insight for the 2011 NA-YGN Drawing Contest.  In light of the events at Fukushima Nuclear Plant, the contest focused on nuclear power on an international scale with the theme,  “Roddy Nuclear Powers the World.”  Roddy is a nuclear fuel pellet, and an NA-YGN mascot, and he is predominantly featured in this year’s drawing contest posters.

NA-YGN would like to thank all chapters for their participation. Your support of this program ensures that the new “young generation” has clear information on nuclear power, and can make informed decisions about our energy future.

This year, voting took place on the CEI website in order to expand our voting audience and to draw attention to this site. Over 250 visitors to the site voted, and for that, we thank you!

We are proud to announce the contest winners:

giovanni

First Place: Giovanni Valforte, Myrtle Avenue Elementary

First Runner-Up: Olivia Whitacre, St. Teresa of Avila

Second Runner-Up: Matthew McHugh, St. Teresa of Avila

Winners will receive an NA-YGN t-shirt, science kit, and books for themselves and their schools.

We encourage all NA-YGN Chapters to participate in the 2012 Drawing Contest, which will be 100% digital for the first time. If you have any feedback or questions about the Drawing Contest, or would like to assist in 2012, please contact Andrea Davis of the NA-YGN Triangle Chapter at .

Two NA-YGN Members Lead the Charge

Posted by Carrington Dillon On January - 23 - 2012

[Approx. Read Time: 3 minutes]

Two North American Young Generation in Nuclear (NA-YGN) members recently offered their thoughts and advice in a guest article on the ANS Nuclear Cafe Blog, encouraging young members of the nuclear energy industry to take complete personal responsibility of  their professional development.

Learning to take charge of my professional and personal development has been the biggest lesson I’ve learned during my first 4 years in the nuclear energy industry, and I felt this article was relevant to my experiences and needs as a young member thus far.  I hope that it helps other NA-YGN members get a head start on their development.

Great job on the article, Jennifer and Elizabeth - although it was published a day too late to help me with my annual appraisal with my supervisor!

Development: Taking Charge of Your Career

Posted on January 18, 2012
By Elizabeth McAndrews-Benavides and Jennifer Varnedoe

Every member of the nuclear industry has a responsibility to focus on his or her own career development as a component of continuous improvement. While this is good advice, young professionals often struggle with how to identify these development opportunities. The question of how to overcome this challenge spirited discussion at the 2011 Young Professionals Conference.

“Young professionals are told to ask for opportunities and additional responsibilities in order to develop ourselves, but we’re never given examples of what opportunities our employers think we should be looking for,” said Adam Nygaard, a member of the North American Young Generation in Nuclear (NA-YGN). “I believe that career development is the primary responsibility of the individual, but employers are stakeholders as well. It’s good that they have finally provided guidance and are working toward closing the knowledge and experience gap in our industry.”

The good news is that young professionals no longer have to guess at the answer to this question. The U.S. electric industry, through the Center for Energy Workforce Development, has created two new resources to help industry leaders, educators, and young professionals navigate development.

These resources are competency models that lay out the knowledge, skills, and abilities that every new employee should master to become a fully competent energy worker. The energy industry is using these models to develop new energy education programs and to improve industry training to ensure that there are qualified energy workers readily available to replace retirees.

“Competency models are a great resource for young professionals to reference before heading into their annual appraisals with their supervisors,” said Gale Hauck, co-chair of the ANS Young Members Group. “These models make it easy for employees to identify their own development gaps and to ask supervisors to include the appropriate opportunities to close these gaps in their personal development plans.”

The Energy Industry Competency Model: Generation, Transmission and Distribution is made up of stacked tiers divided by blocks representing competencies. Each block represents a focus area that needs to be developed in new energy workers. This resource was developed to help non-licensed operators, maintenance personnel, and technicians.

The Engineering Competency Model builds off of the previous model and replaces the top three tiers with engineering-specific competencies. Once an engineer meets all of the entry level competencies they can move on to the 3+-year-experienced engineer competencies.

Hauck said, “It’s nice to have a development road map. Young professionals no longer have to struggle to figure out what development opportunities they need, they can focus on being developed.”

Chris Hearn, U.S. Affairs chair of NA-YGN, added, “Now that these resources are available, conference planning committees and local chapters of NA-YGN can use this information to design professional development sessions. All you have to do is look at the competency model and identify which competency your members need the most help with.”

North American Young Generation in Nuclear is a professional society for those working in nuclear science and technology. It has 8,500 members and 97 local chapters. The ANS Young Members Group is a technical group of the American Nuclear Society with more 1,000 members.


Jennifer Varnedoe is chair of the ANS Young Members Group. She is a project engineer with Advanced Programs at GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy. She has been an ANS member since 2007 and is a guest contributor to the ANS Nuclear Cafe.

Elizabeth is past president of NA-YGN. She is manager of Industry Infrastructure at the Nuclear Energy Institute. In this role she is focused on work force development and supply chain issues for the nuclear industry. Prior to this job, she worked for Constellation Energy in its new nuclear division, UniStar Nuclear.

Michigan American Nuclear Society holds Essay Contest

Posted by Kristine Madden On December - 29 - 2011

[Approx. Read Time: 2 minutes]

How often do you think about where the electricity you use to power your lights, computer and television comes from? Chances are not often, if ever.

This past October, the Michigan American Nuclear Society hosted an essay contest as part of Careers in Energy Week asking high school students to do just that. The “Get into Nuclear Energy” essay contest targeted raising awareness of nuclear energy careers among Michigan high school students. The contest asked students to explain why nuclear energy workers have and continue to improve our local communities. The contest, which was funded by an Entergy Nuclear grant, awarded the first, second, and third place winners with an iPad, iTouch, and iPod Nano, respectively. The contest also awarded the schools with the highest percentage of participation with a monetary donation to their science department.

The contest ran over a two-week period and resulted in the society receiving over 400 essays. The contest winners were spread across the state and even into the Upper Peninsula! The winning essays will be posted on our website. The first, second, and third place student winners are as follows:

  1. Megan Locatis, Allegan High School;
  2. Carolyn Payson, Battle Creek Math and Science Cetner;
  3. Jessica Barjaktarovich, Macomb Academy of Arts and Sciences.

Here is a link to their essays.

The schools with the highest participation were:

Having read over 100 essays myself, I can say that I was immensely excited to see the amount of research and effort that the students and teachers put into exploring careers options in the nuclear field. The essays highlighted the important impact nuclear energy workers have on ensuring that our communities stay functional through both the production of electricity and philanthropic work. The overall goal of the contest was to expose high school students to careers in the nuclear sciences and hopefully spark an early interest in future career choices.

The Michigan American Nuclear Society is looking forward to hosting another essay contest to ring in National Nuclear Science Week. This time around the contest wil ask high school students to write a persuasive letter to their local Congressperson or Senator describing why nuclear energy should continue be a part of our national energy portfolio.

VOTE! - 2011 NA-YGN Drawing Contest

Posted by Carrington Dillon On December - 19 - 2011

[Approx. Read Time: <1 minute]

North American Young Generation in Nuclear (NA-YGN) recently held their 13th Annual “Roddy Nuclear” Drawing contest all over North America.  Roddy Nuclear is a nuclear fuel pellet cartoon character who can fit into the palm of a child’s hand.  In fact, Roddy provides as much energy as almost two-thousand pounds of coal and 17,000 cubic feet of natural gas!

NA-YGN members used Roddy’s adventures to present the benefits of nuclear energy to over 1,000 4th and 5th grade students in this year’s contest.  The theme for the contest was “Roddy Nuclear Powers the World.“  Students were asked to submit drawings inspired by the theme and what they learned during the presentations.

NA-YGN would like to thank all of it’s participating members along with all of the educators who contributed to the success of this year’s contest.  Now, we just have to pick a winner!

Click here to vote for the winner:

2011 NA-YGN Drawing Contest Voting

The voting deadline is January 13th, 2012.

The winners (1st place, Runner-up, First Runner up) will be announced during National Nuclear Science Week — January 23rd, 2012.

olivia

makenzieryanmadisonmatthewgiovanni

Click HERE to view last year’s 2010 Drawing Contest Winners.

NA-YGN represents at Public Meeting for North Anna Restart

Posted by Bobby Ashworth On December - 16 - 2011

[Approx. Read Time: 1 minute]

On November 1, 2011, several North American Young Generation in Nuclear (NA-YGN) members attended the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (NRC) public meeting for the potential restart of Dominion Power’s North Anna Power Station (NAPS). The purpose of the meeting was for the NRC and Dominion to provide members of the public with the status of inspections and current information for NAPS after the August 23rd earthquake in Mineral, VA.

Dominion Energy's North Anna Nuclear Power Station

Dominion Energy's North Anna Nuclear Power Station

The first half of the meeting allowed Dominion and the NRC to discuss their findings. To date, neither Dominion nor the NRC has identified any significant damage to essential safety systems of NAPS. Inspections and reviews continue to ensure the safety of the plants prior to restart. No date has yet been targeted for restart of the plants.

The second half of the meeting involved public commentary and questions for the NRC and Dominion. Public responses and questions varied, but several audience members indicated mistrust of Dominion and the NRC to ensure the safety of the power plant. The telling moment of NA-YGN’s presence occurred when one member of the audience questioned whether Dominion had paid individuals to come-out wearing t-shirts and buttons that advocated for nuclear power. There was a loud response of “NO” from the crowd and a cynical rebuttal from the questioning individual: “I guess you all must just be fans of nuclear power.”

As hard as it may be for some to understand, there are people that are proud to show support for nuclear power.

American Nuclear Society Visits Capitol Hill

Posted by Adam Nygaard On November - 16 - 2011

[Approx. Read Time: 2 minutes]

On Thursday, November 3rd, approximately 90 American Nuclear Society members ended their annual winter meeting with a Capitol Hill visit. Constituents from over 20 states visited with their elected officials and their staffers to promote nuclear energy.

dc2011capitol

Pictured from L to R: Jennifer Varnedoe (Progress Energy), Eric Helin (GE Hitachi), Myron Koblansky (Westinghouse), Adam Nygaard (Duke Energy)

Hill Visit team and topic:

The North Carolina team represented a variety of nuclear companies that reach across the state. The team’s previous experience at communicating with policy makers ranged from first timers to experienced veterans. While the primary purpose of the hill visit was to support nuclear in general; our team decided to raise attention to the recent letter from the Nuclear Engineering Department Heads Organization to Senators Feinstein and Alexander.

The letter, signed by all Nuclear Engineering Department Heads, encourages congress to restore funding for U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE) nuclear research and development programs as well as the Integrated University Program (IUP) as Fiscal Year 2012 Energy and Water Appropriations are being finalized. The team discussed the upcoming labor shortage in the nuclear industry and the need for stable, successful nuclear engineering programs.

The Hill Visit:

The first appointment of the day was with Kara Weishaar, the Energy Legislative Assistant (LA) for Senator Richard Burr (R-NC). Kara was very friendly with the ANS group and re-assured Senator Burr’s support of nuclear energy as a clean and reliable source of electricity.

House of Representative Member Melvin Watt (D-12th/NC) supports a comprehensive energy policy that includes nuclear according to his Energy Legislative Assistant, Eric Love, from Charlotte.

The team also visited Senator Kay Hagan’s (D-NC) office and spoke with Energy LA Aaron Suntag. Aaron was very engaged in the conversation and expressed that Sen. Hagan was a strong supporter of nuclear. It was encouraging to learn that Aaron occasionally works with Kara from Senator Burr’s office (Democrats and Republicans can get along!)

Finally, the day ended with an appointment with Jack Huerter, Energy Legislative Assistant for Congressman Mike McIntyre (D-7th/NC). Jack informed the ANS members that Rep. McIntyre is a strong supporter of nuclear. The congressman is concerned about domestic energy supply and realizes that nuclear must be part of the mix. As the discussion with Mr. Huerter came to a close, Congressman McIntyre unexpectedly popped in his office and agreed to a quick photo op.

The elected officials of North Carolina overwhelming support nuclear energy. This is not the case in every state. Your voice matters. Write a letter or give a phone call to your elected representative today and show your support for a nuclear future.

dc2011repmcintyre

Pictured from L to R: C.J. Milmoe (Milmoe Consulting Services LLC), Eric Helin (GE Hitachi), Margaret Harding (4 Factor Consulting), Congressman Mike McIntyre Adam Nygaard (Duke Energy), Jennifer Varnedoe (Progress Energy)

It’s Not a Job. It’s an Adventure.

Posted by Elizabeth McAndrew-Benavides On November - 2 - 2011

[Approx. Read Time: 1 minute]

Last week, Elizabeth McAndrew-Benavides, NA-YGN Past President, participated in the U.S. Navy’s Educational Orientation Visit (EOV) program. This unique opportunity showed participants what it is like to have a career in the U.S. Navy and expanded their understanding of the Navy’s extensive training program.

“I was very excited to participate. Navy Nukes are a traditional work force pipeline for the commercial nuclear energy industry,” said McAndrew-Benavides. “These highly trained individuals have integrated well into the safety oriented careers that the nuclear energy industry demands.”

One exciting piece of information the participants learned during this tour was that first women have begun their training that will allow them to serve on the Navy’s submarine fleet. “Hopefully I will have the opportunity to meet these ladies when they finish their first submarine tours. I’m inspired just thinking about them,” said McAndrew-Benavides.

The two day EOV program is filled with information, training and tours. Participants saw both the USS Bonhomme Richard and a Los Angeles class fast attack submarine named the USS Hampton. During a hands-on portion of the program, participants were encouraged to partake in a Damage Control (DC) training facility demonstration. This DC training locks participants in a water tight room quickly filling with water with a goal to patch leaking pipes. This training gives sailors the opportunity to practice their team building skills by performing a critical activity in a stressful environment.

eov-2011

At the end of the program Elizabeth said, “I appreciate the U.S. Navy and all the sailors who made my trip memorable. Even if we never work together, I’m glad there are such great guys and gals keeping the navy’s nuclear propulsion systems working safely!”

liz-on-bridge-of-uss-hampton

[Approximate Read Time - 1 minute]

The World Association of Nuclear Operators (WANO) announced their annual Nuclear Excellence Awards today at the conclusion of their eleventh Biennial General Meeting held in Shenzhen, China.

Susan Reilly Landahl, Chief Operation Officer of Exelon Nuclear and member of NA-YGN’s Executive Advisory Committee was one of the eight recipients this year. The Nuclear Excellence awards identify individuals who have made extraordinary contributions to excellence in the operation of nuclear power plants or infrastructure that supports their operation.

NA-YGN would like to congratulate Susan on her well-deserved award. “She has long been a strong proponent of promoting diversity within the nuclear industry,” NA-YGN Professional Development Chair Erin West said. “NA-YGN is grateful for her generous support and is glad to see her recognized by her peers for her efforts.”

Susan was recognized for her relentless pursuit of excellence, wide variety of key positions in Exelon’s fleet and her significant contribution as a mentor and role model to others in the industry, including through organizations such as U.S. Women in Nuclear and North American Young Generation in Nuclear (NA-YGN).

img-20111025-00024

The NA-YGN Executive Advisory Council provides guidance to the NA-YGN Board of Directors. WANO established the Nuclear Excellence Awards in 2003.

Mothers in Nuclear Share Their Stories

Posted by Elizabeth McAndrew-Benavides On October - 18 - 2011

[Approximate Read Time: 10 minutes]

There are many intelligent, caring and dedicated mothers in the nuclear industry. In order to share their experience about the nuclear world, NA-YGN has managed to capture the perspectives of four of these women. Their stories are humorous and insightful, and provide proof that you can be a nuclear professional while having a home life at the same time. Hope you enjoy the stories.

mothers-logo-horizontal1

Nursing Mothers in the Nuclear Industry

By: Kristin Murray Zaitz, Vice President, NA-YGN

kristin-and-oliver-8-11

Breasts are not usually mentioned in polite conversation in the nuclear industry. And since I’m writing about breastfeeding, this isn’t the only time I’m going to mention them in this article—go ahead and get your giggles out now.

Before I dive into the unique challenges of being a nursing mother in the nuclear industry, let me take a moment to explain the importance of breastfeeding and its challenges for working mothers. Infants under 4-6 months of age get their nutrition entirely from breastmilk or formula for those families who choose not to breastfeed. Breastfeeding is the healthiest option for both mothers and babies, and employers also benefit from the corresponding reduction in health care costs and decreased absenteeism. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends breastfeeding for at least the first twelve months of life, and there are laws protecting nursing mothers in the United States and Canada.

Even with all of the benefits of breastfeeding, it is still difficult for a working mother to continue nursing her infant after she returns to the workplace. For those who are unfamiliar with the plight of the working and nursing mother, it is truly a labor of love. In order for a nursing mother to maintain her milk supply and comfort, she must pump breastmilk every 2-4 hours. This gets even more complicated if, like me, your workplace happens to be a nuclear power plant.

Issue #1: Getting a breastpump through security. Need I say more? The situation was usually comical, but one special day stands out in my mind. After what seemed like the hundredth time passing my breastpump through security, a well-meaning guard asked me to open the “mechanism.” The breastpump itself is sealed for sanitation and functional purposes, so opening the “mechanism” was a tall order. After a few minutes of trying to explain this to him, he was saved by a coworker who took over the search and muttered an apology to me without ever raising his eyes. Embarrassing, yes. Unexpected, not really.

Issue #2: Washing breastpump components in the break room. The nuclear industry doesn’t pose anything unique about the need to wash breastpump components after their use, but my predominantly male engineering office made it a little bit more interesting. I stopped counting the number of times I was asked, “What are you making for lunch?” or “What’s that for?” At first I would explain, but then after seeing the typical reaction, I resorted to, “You don’t want to ask that question, trust me.”

Issue #3: Workplace conditions. Not many jobs require one to don anti-contamination clothing and spend hours at a time in a radioactive field. Every time I needed to do an inspection in a radiologically controlled area, it was a race against the clock. By the time the pre-job brief was done and I gained access to the area, it was almost always time to exit the area and pump again. This was frustrating, but I learned excellent time management skills.

Issue #4: Refueling outages. Power plants are extremely inconsiderate of one’s personal time. When my son was six months old, I had to work to support a 35-day-long refueling outage. That’s not so bad in itself, except my shift was 13 hours long, and I only got two days off during the entire thing. Even though I had to be away from him for so long, I felt much better knowing that I was providing him with the most nutritious and beneficial food possible.

Issue #5: Location. Nuclear power plants are usually isolated, so it’s not easy to just stop on by and nurse a baby during a break from work. I live 40 minutes away from my workplace, and that’s fairly common in this industry. The isolation was challenging, but it just made it more rewarding to come home at the end of the day. After he was about eight months old, my son would greet me with an ecstatic “Mama!!!” and reach for me while using his sign language to say “MILK!”

Issue #6: Facilities for pumping. When I returned from maternity leave, there was not a good setup or precedent for accommodation of nursing mothers. Pumping breastmilk requires access to a clean, private room with a lockable door and 15 minutes of solitude to accomplish the task. The first day back on the job I was nearly frantic by hour three when the private room that had been promised (and required by law) was not available. Not available? What was I supposed to do, wait and pump another day? Fortunately the situation was remedied and I was soon given access to a private room. Just say the word “breast” enough and people will spring into action to avoid the embarrassment of you mentioning it anymore. At least that’s what worked for me.

Somehow through all of this, my son and I made it through his first year without the need to supplement his diet with formula. I know that he would have been fine if nursing didn’t work out, but I feel deeply blessed that we were able to continue breastfeeding after my return to work. And while a nuclear power plant may not be headlined in the next working mother’s survey of family-friendly workplaces, the challenges were not insurmountable.

So what’s my advice to other nursing mothers in the nuclear industry? You can do it! And keep a sense of humor, you’ll need it.


Does Mickey Go In The Front? Or the Back?

By: Elizabeth McAndrew-Benavides, Past President, NA-YGN

Parenting via Skype isn’t a chapter in “What to Expect”. This is a new parenting phenomenon that I would be happy to ghost-write for that popular parenting book series.

My first opportunity to parent via Skype occurred almost two years ago. Both my husband and I are required to travel moderately for our nuclear careers. It just so happens that we both had overnight business trips on the same day when my daughter was one year old.

Being a two nuke family, we had an advance plan for how to manage child care. My cousin offered to babysit on a work night. Our nanny would stay late until he arrived at the house after work and would be ready early the next morning so he could go to work.

Things seemed to work out perfectly. My cousin was a 20 something recent college grad, so as long as he skipped happy hour, he didn’t have any evening responsibilities. He had babysat my daughter before and lived nearby.

Things seemed great. Both my husband and I went our separate ways at the airport and my nanny and cousin had our daughter covered for a 24 hour period.

I decided to call and check-in with my cousin before I set out for dinner that evening. He told me he had been at the house for about an hour and had already fed my daughter dinner. We chatted for a few minutes, but we ended the call when my cousin had to change my daughter’s diaper.

I was about to walk out of my hotel room to head to dinner when my cousin called back. He didn’t know which way the diaper went on. This was hilarious to me. I asked him how he managed to babysit before without changing a diaper and he responded that he usually had his girlfriend with him. After I stopped laughing, I told him how to put on the diaper.

Once again, I was just about to walk out the door of my hotel room to head to dinner when my cousin called back. He didn’t think the diaper looked right and asked me if Mickey went in the front or in the back? This question threw me, because the diapers I had purchased had Disney characters on the front and the back. I couldn’t remember where Mickey was on the diaper.

You’d think this would be something that could be resolved on the phone, but it wasn’t. I had to log into my work computer to Skype with my daughter and cousin. If at all possible, I would suggest you never attempted to teach someone how to virtually put a diaper on a baby. Even though this method of communication worked, it was not ideal. I could see the diaper and reassure my cousin that everything was placed properly, but I could show him how to make sure the diaper was snug, but not too tight. My daughter survived and didn’t seem disturbed by the situation.

My advice to nuclear mothers who travel would be to ensure you have access to Skype. You never know when your child is going to need a little love and care, even when you are half way across the country.


Juggling Pregnancy & Motherhood in Nuclear Power

By: Ariadna Clark, NA-YGN Member

How do you feel about reading the words “pregnancy”, “motherhood” and “nuclear” in the same sentence? Did it make you cringe a little? Did you raise your eyebrows and think “yikes…!”? Well… that’s me: a woman (Puerto Rican for that matter!), a mother and… oh yes, an engineer at a Nuclear Power Plant.

Since I was very little, I always dreamed of having a family and a career. Following my dreams, I went to college, studied my butt off to graduate with a Mechanical Engineering degree, and left my tropical Puerto Rico to come to the United States to begin my career as a Systems Engineer in a nuclear power plant. That is how I met nuclear power. While working at the power plant, I also managed to meet the love of my life and got married. My husband is also an engineer at the power plant and he currently works in the Operations department as a Shift Manager.

After more than a couple of happy years of DINK (Dual Income No Kids), my husband and I decided to start a family. To be honest with you, I had no idea how this would work. A career in nuclear power can be exhausting by itself, and try to imagine how it is when BOTH parents are “nukes”! Basically, after almost seven years of being a professional nuclear worker, I had no idea how I was going to manage both. My hands without a baby were full enough.

Another thing that made me nervous about the “Baby + Nuclear Experience” was that I did not know a single female that had “recently” (for the purpose of this blog “recently” is defined as within 7 years) gone through this experience in the industry. I did not have anybody that I could relate to or anybody to ask for advice, opinions or insight. But that wasn’t going to stop me; I was about to figure this out by myself. Better said, WE (me, my husband and our careers) were going to figure out how to do this!

Well… in January of 2009 I found out I was pregnant. Needless to say, my husband and I were ecstatic. At the time, I was a Supervisor in the I&C (Instrumentation & Controls) department. In case you are not too familiar with it, “Maintenance Supervisor” in a nuclear industry is equal to long hours, frequent calls in the middle of the night, and a non-stop kind of job. A couple of weeks after I formally announced my pregnancy to my manager at the time, I was placed in a different job position, a more “desk friendly” job. I became the PM (Predefined Maintenance) Coordinator at my plant. I confess that this new job was a little bit like a “career sacrifice” in my eyes, but my pregnancy needed something like this… something that will provide me the environment and the flexibility that I needed at the time, while giving me the opportunity to greatly contribute to my organization.

In September of that year we had our son, Marco. He has changed my life and made it a million times more meaningful. I have to admit that the “desk friendly” job was a savior in many instances, however, after two years of performing that “desk friendly” function, I was aching to return to my more technical roots. Just a few months ago, I interviewed and received an offer to be a Work Week Manager at my site. This position is much more my style… it’s demanding, complicated, stressful and extremely rewarding. Just the way I like it! (haha- yes, you can call me CRAZY, others think the same too!!!) It also provides me the opportunity to grow and develop my career.

Two things that help me juggle motherhood and nuclear are ORGANIZATION and LOOKING AHEAD. Sounds easy, right? Remember that my husband works shifts, so he has a different schedule every single week. For this reason, I always carry with me my husband’s shift rotation schedule and try to schedule projects, special assignments and personal appointments around that. I quickly found out how being creative is crucial in my situation. For example, my husband and I were doing “baby turnover” in the main parking lot last year during a refueling outage. I negotiated with the daycare that my son attends to have earlier opening hours that support my work hours. When I accepted the Work Week Manager position I worked out with a peer to swap work weeks to ensure my assigned work weeks will line up with the one week in my husband’s shift rotation that fully supports my schedule! But don’t think that I’m the only one working double duty here; my husband works his butt off too. He’s the chef of the house (thank God because I don’t cook) and he also helps me out with Marco and the house chores. My husband’s help and support is essential to our success.

As I move forward trying to balance motherhood and my career I ask myself: Can I do this? How can I do this? How far can I go in my career while having a baby? Can I have a baby AND a career in nuclear power, with the demands both entail? I have recently found out that I am not the only mother or mother-to-be that is asking herself these same questions.

Unfortunately, I do not have all the answers for these questions YET. All I know is that so far it is working for me. I cannot tell you the key for your success, because there is not a single right answer. But I can certainly tell you that IT IS POSSIBLE.

I am not going to sugar coat it, nor going to tell you what you may want to hear…It is not easy, but it is extremely rewarding, no doubt. Both family and career are full of demands all of the time, and I don’t always know how I will fulfill those demands. I am looking ahead all the time, thinking through how I am going to manage this, planning down to the details, and setting the wheels in motion. And guess what? Just when you think it works perfectly, something will get in the way. This is why I learned I have to be open-minded and flexible. This is when creativity comes to bear!

Would I do it all over again? Absolutely! My son is almost 2 years old now and I am proud as I see him developing as a person and I continue to grow in my career. As I look around in the “nuclear world” I see more and more women that are trying the “Baby + Nuclear Experience”. It is nice to know that I can be there to help them thru the process, provide advice if they need it, and help them to visualize that YES, IT IS POSSIBLE….nuclear women can be MOMs!!


Nuclear Engineer, Three Children and the Wonders of Having a Work-From-Home Husband

By: Shannon Bragg-Sitton, Past-President, NA-YGN

A few months ago I was flying home from a business trip, anxious to see my kids after a few days away. I spoke with my husband during the first layover of a 3-leg trip, fully expecting to have some delay. Everything was going well on the home front, and my flights even appeared to be on time. I turned on my phone during my second layover to find an MMS message from my husband. Shock set in when I realized that it was a photo of a fluorescent green cast … on my 3-year-old’s arm. What could possibly have happened in the last 3 hours as I flew across the country???

As it turns out, my son had actually broken his arm about 6 days prior (he fell off the bed while playing), and my husband had assured him that he was fine. Whining and complaining is normal for a 3-year-old, right? The regular wrestling matches with his brother still continued during the 6-day window, occasionally broken up by whining. Well, Dad finally gave in and took him to see a doctor when his baby sister managed to make him cry for 20 minutes just by touching his arm… Such is the life in a family when Dad is the primary care giver, I suppose. No softies here!

We all know that being a mom in a challenging technical field isn’t easy. My name is Shannon Bragg-Sitton, and I have a doctorate in nuclear engineering. I currently work in the Space Nuclear Systems and Technology Division at the Idaho National Laboratory, but I have enjoyed a diverse career thus far, having recently left a coveted tenure-track position at Texas A&M University in order to gain a bit of my sanity back via more reasonable work hours. My husband, Michael, and I have been married for 14 years (wow!) and have three kids – Caleb, 5; Ryan, 3; and Avery, 1.

Things have been busy for the past few years as we have juggled careers and raised a young family. Until a couple years ago I was balancing on the brink of insanity and was well into the effects of severe sleep deprivation. Michael was working as a consultant in information technology, meaning that he was on travel at least half the time. I found myself with two kids that had to go to two different daycare centers (finding infant care can be tough!) and a new job that demanded much more than the 40 hours per week advertised, basically functioning as a single mom half the time. The teary-eyed drop-offs in the mornings were never fun; when a fever spiked, I scrambled to find someone to teach my class so I could resume full-time Mom duty. Thankfully, my kids have been reasonably healthy and I only had to beg a colleague to cover my class a couple times.

The evenings weren’t much easier as I raced to pick up the boys, feed all of us, and get the boys to bed before my patience gave way. It was then that we began to consider a new approach: What if one of us were to stay home with the boys? We had discussed the benefits of homeschooling in the future, so why not start the stay-at-home culture early? I wasn’t interested in leaving my career after all those years in school, nor do I believe that I have the patience necessary to effectively teach my own children (without tears from all of us, that is). But Michael was excited to leave IT behind to begin a new venture in property management and take on the role of a stay-at-home dad and primary home school teacher.

We are now a couple of years into this decision, and we couldn’t be happier in the choice. We’ve even had to move to zone defense now that we’ve added a daughter to the equation, but things seem to work for us. If you have a strong, supportive husband willing to stay home with the kids, count yourself as a lucky woman. Buck the cultural norm. It’s great for the kids, and it can be great for Mom and Dad too.

Last weekend I received a flyer for a MOPS – Moms of Preschoolers – meeting. I passed it to my husband, suggesting that it was only called “MOPS” because “DOPS” just didn’t sound as good. Surely Dads are also welcome to come, right? Yeah… he didn’t believe me either. Such is the case for a counter-cultural family with a work-from-home, primary-care-giving, and homeschool teacher Dad. Odd looks from the Moms at the park are a common occurrence, and I’m sure that many wonder if the “flipped” roles were selected by choice. Finding a comfortable social circle hasn’t been easy, but my husband has been pretty resilient and we’ve found a decent support network of other homeschool families (even though Mom is the one home teaching the kids!).

I admit that what works so well for us wouldn’t work for everyone, but it can be a great option if it’s available. This isn’t your June Cleaver household where all the laundry is done, the house sparkles and a hot dinner is on the table each night. Far from it. In fact, with the kids home during the day, there tends to be a lot more toys strewn about (that may have attributed to that broken arm, but that hasn’t been proven!), but I’ll take the trade-off for happier kids and happier parents. Who cares about having a spic-n-span house when you can say that?

Being a working mom is a balancing act. You have to start by setting your priorities—family first, in my opinion—and sticking to them. Our extended family didn’t respond enthusiastically when we first talked about our plan of becoming a one-income household with my husband holding down the home front. But they now see how much it has benefitted the kids and the family as a whole. All moms will eventually find the equation that works best for them. Being a good mom does not mean that you have to sacrifice your career and upward mobility, but it may mean that you need to modify your approach from time to time. I wish you all the energy you will need as you find the right balance for your family!

Clean, Sustainable, Renewable, & Green.

Posted by Adam Reichenbach On October - 18 - 2011

[Approx. Read Time: 2 minutes]

Clean. Sustainable. Renewable. Green. patrick_moore

These are the words that Dr. Patrick Moore used to describe the ideal energy source during a recent talk at an evening event at the brand new UNC-Charlotte Center City building in uptown Charlotte, NC.  He was quick to point out that no single source meets all of these adjectives.  This was one of the many topics Dr. Moore covered during his hour-long discussion with an audience of about one hundred on September 16th.  The event was hosted by CASEnergy and the North American-Young Generation in Nuclear (NA-YGN), with additional assistance from the local chapters of American Nuclear Society (ANS) and Young Professionals in Energy (YPE).

Dr. Moore has a very impressive resume, including a Ph.D. in ecology and career highlights such as co-founding Greenpeace and serving as a current co-chair of CASEnergy. He left Greenpeace due to many differing views, which he discussed during the presentation. One of the overlying reasons was Greenpeace’s adamantly narrow viewpoint on ecological issues and how they failed to notice the benefits of some advances in science. He used genetic engineering as an example.  In many countries around the world the staple of their diet is white rice, Dr. Moore explained.   However, white rice lacks the nutrients of other staples (such as wheat). People have found a way to genetically enhance white rice into brown rice, which contains those necessary nutrients that white rice lacks. However, since Greenpeace is against any form of genetic engineering, they fight to prevent the implementation of brown rice as thousands of adults and children continue to die every year due to malnourishment.

Another interesting topic Dr. Moore covered dealt with the idea behind the word “green.” After introducing it in his ideas about the ideal source of energy, he went on to say that unlike the other words he used (clean, sustainable, and renewable), “green” does not have a clear definition.   It has become a commercial term and therefore lacks the meaning that it once had to him when he co-founded Greenpeace.

Naturally, he discussed the topic of nuclear energy and his change to the other side (having previously been an opponent). The idea behind his switch was simple; all he needed to do was separate nuclear weapons from nuclear power. Having started Greenpeace by protesting against nuclear missile testing, all things nuclear were the same in Dr. Moore’s mind - unequivocally bad. However, as he thought more about the topic and discussed it with people around the industry, he began to understand that there was a clear difference between nuclear weapons and nuclear power. Nuclear power was being used to help society by providing a safe source of energy, which is completely different than the destruction caused by nuclear weapons. He realized the error in his previous thought process, and he is now a proponent of nuclear energy.

Another notable fact he mentioned about nuclear were the studies which have linked low levels of radiation to healthier individuals.  He noted that there have been a number of studies about people that were around the nuclear industry, whether that was commercial operations or mining. The results have shown that these people are actually healthier than the average individual. Researchers have postulated that similar to how the body fights illness and comes out stronger afterwards, cells being broken down due to low levels of radiation must be rebuilt, thus helping the body grow stronger and healthier.

During the Q & A discussion, Dr. Moore explains some challenges to the conventional wisdom on global warming.  Plants and aquatic life typically thrive with a higher concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere.  Using the population of Canada vs. the US as an example, Dr. Moore suggested warmer temperatures may make the planet more habitable for humans in the long run.

The discussion was very insightful and filled with interesting facts.  Dr. Moore has a perspective shaped by his unique experiences and is certainly not one to shy away from controversial topics.  This approach rewards the audience with many new ideas to share and topics to learn about for many days following the event.

Oyster Creek Response

Posted by Morgan Davis On October - 12 - 2011

[Approx. Read Time: 2 min]

This letter is in response to: http://berkeley-nj.patch.com/articles/petitioners-to-nrc-shut-down-all-fukushima-like-nuclear-plants

I am a Chemical Engineer that works at a Mark I plant.  I choose to live within ten miles of the plant knowing that the operations of the facility are safe and reliable.  I love the community at which I live and I am very confident telling my neighbors and family that I am keeping them safe and providing them with reliable power everyday.

20080103_oystercreek

I can tell you that the information in this article is incorrect.  The nuclear utilities in the US are working very closely with Japan to learn from their event and help them recover.  We have world class nuclear professionals from the US in Japan right now working along side them.  Due to some of the retrofits from September 11th we have some modifications in our plants that would mitigate a similar event along with more robust response plans for loss of power.

There are a lot of incorrect facts in this article but the one I want to address particularly is that this article incorrectly states that radioactive fuel fragments were found scattered around the Fukushima site.  While there was core damage, the fuel remained in containment.  This article suggests a lot of things that are not true such as operating outside of our license from the NRC which is our “contract”.  If we do not follow our license, we break the law and there are serious consequences for the company and even the individual plant worker.  This is definitely not something we take lightly.  It also suggests that we “experiment” with our plant with installing vent systems.  I have no idea where this came from but nuclear power is special and unique and we do not experiment with our plants.  Every design change or change in operations is carefully reviewed by multiple scientists and engineers internally and externally to ensure that the change is safe.  On top of that we have to prove to the NRC and other government agencies that we are operating safely on a daily basis.

I am asking that if you are reading this article and you are interested in this issue that you reach out and find the facts.  Please reminder that most facts do not include absolutes (always, never, etc.).

Please listen to all sides of the arguments and make your own judgment.

NA-YGN Chapter Gives Back to Schools

Posted by Lionel Locke On September - 7 - 2011

[Approx. Read Time: 1 minute]

Left to right: Imani Lockhart, Principal Paul Kennamer, Zachary Patterson, Carla Dulaney, Matthew Bush, Harward Durham, John Stubblefield, Melinda Rogers, and Lionel Locke.

Left to right: Imani Lockhart, Principal Paul Kennamer, Zachary Patterson, Carla Dulaney, Matthew Bush, Harward Durham, John Stubblefield, Melinda Rogers, and Lionel Locke.

The Bellefonte Chapter of North American Young Generation in Nuclear (NA-YGN) held its first annual School Supply Drive during the month of August to benefit schools in the Jackson County (Alabama) area.  Thanks to our Vector NA-YGN members in the Chattanooga and Knoxville locations, we were able to expand the donations collected for the Bellefonte supply drive to benefit local students.

The school supplies were presented to the staff of Hollywood Elementary School on Thursday August 11th, 2011.  Supplies include, but are not limited to: three-ring binders, copy paper, folders, color pencils, markers, pens, and USB flash drives that will be used for eight grade projects.   Electric pencil sharpeners and large desk calendars were also donated for each classroom.  Principal Paul Kennamer stated that “getting all of these supplies is like Christmas” and looked forward to the jobs that Bellefonte will be creating for the area.

I would like to thank the entire Bellefonte Team for their contributions towards our first school supply drive, and offer a special thanks to Burns & McDonnell and Partners in Education (PIE) for their generosity in this effort.

bellefontena-ygnsupplies

Va. Governor McDonnell touts benefits of uranium mining

Posted by Aaron Ruby On July - 18 - 2011

[Approx. Read Time: 3 minutes] On Tuesday, Virginia’s Governor Bob McDonnell touted the benefits of allowing uranium mining in the state, saying that the industry would bring “a tremendous number of jobs, tax revenues and opportunities to support the nuclear industry.” The Governor went on to say that “if it can be done safely, then I’m all for it.” The Governor is waiting for an independent National Academy of Sciences study to be released in December before making a determination about whether to lift a moratorium on uranium mining in the state.

The Governor’s favorable comments came on the heels of another important endorsement. Last week Virginia and West Virginia chapters of the American Institute of Professional Geologists (AIPG) formally announced their support for plans to develop the largest untapped uranium deposit in the U.S., located in Southside Virginia.mcdonnell

The Coles Hill uranium deposit in Pittsylvania County is believed to contain enough uranium to supply Virginia’s nuclear fuel needs for as many as 75 years.

In a statement, AIPG President Mike Lawless said that the Coles Hill project would “help our society move toward energy independence, which has both strategic and economic benefits.” The U.S. currently imports 86% of its uranium from foreign countries, including such major exporters as Russia, Kazakhstan and Namibia. The Russian government alone accounts for as much as a third of U.S. supply.

Many analysts worry that U.S. reliance on the Russian government for such a large share of our uranium supply could place the U.S. in a precarious situation should the Russians decide to cut off exports. In January 2009, angered over a pricing dispute with the Ukrainian government, Russia suddenly cut off natural gas exports to Eastern Europe for more than a month, leaving millions of homes and businesses without heat or electricity.

AIPG President Mike Lawless also expressed confidence that Virginia Uranium, the company seeking to mine and mill the Coles Hill deposit, would develop Coles Hill in an environmentally responsible manner. “Environmental stewardship including protection of air and water quality, as well as site restoration following mining, is an important aspect of successful resource development,” said Lawless in a statement. “Virginia Uranium’s commitment to conservation and historic preservation, as well as the fact that the company is a member of the local community, indicate that the development will occur to the benefit not only of Southside Virginia, but also the entire Commonwealth.”

The National Academy of Sciences is currently conducting an 18-month independent study of the potential environmental and public health impacts, with a report due to the General Assembly and Virginia Coal & Energy Commission in December 2011. State lawmakers will assess the NAS findings as they consider whether to lift the moratorium and allow state agencies to develop necessary permits and regulations for the industry.

Last year, the Virginia Chapter of the Health Physics Society, an organization representing thousands of radiation protection specialists in the state, announced its support for allowing uranium mining in Virginia. “The proposed mining endeavors can be carried out with minimal impact on the environmental quality of the surrounding areas while simultaneously stimulating the economy of Southside Virginia, filling a vacancy in our country’s energy needs, and reducing the United States’ dependence on foreign sources of energy,” wrote Carter Ficklen, President of the Virginia Health Physics Society.

NA-YGN Gets Social

Posted by Carrington Dillon On July - 6 - 2011

[Approx. Read Time: <1 min]

With North American Young Generation in Nuclear’s continued effort to serve as a voice of the nuclear industry and make a difference in the clean energy debate, we have taken to social media outlets to get the word out.  Led by members Jack Gamble and Patrick Mason, NA-YGN will keep in touch with its members and the public through social media sites like Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, and YouTube.  Follow us on these sites for updates on the industry and NA-YGN news.  Join the conversation and Move Energy Forward!

Twitter: @NA_YGN

http://twitter.com/#!/NA_YGN 

Facebook: North American Young Generation in Nuclear

http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/North-American-Young-Generation-in-Nuclear-NA-YGN/125288777483195 

LinkedIn: North American Young Generation in Nuclear

http://www.linkedin.com/groups?mostPopular=&gid=74668

YouTube: NAYGN

http://www.youtube.com/user/NAYGN 

Industry Will Improve From Fukushima Lessons

Posted by Jesse Skinner On June - 17 - 2011

[Approx. Read Time: 2 minutes]

While no one knows how the on-going Fukushima nuclear accident will affect the nuclear industry, one thing is certain: nuclear power generation will become even safer. One of the greatest strengths of the nuclear industry is its safety culture. According to the international nuclear safety advisory group, “Safety Culture is that assembly of characteristics and attitudes in organizations and individuals which establishes that, as an overriding priority, nuclear plant safety issues receive the attention warranted by their significance.” [1]

Safety Improvements After Three Mile Island

This safety culture can best be seen by the industry’s response to nuclear accidents. The most significant of which, for the U.S. nuclear energy industry, was the 1979 accident at three mile island unit 2. Since that accident there have been improvements in regulation, emergency readiness, to plant systems, and in severe accident management [2]. The upgrades and improvements have increased safety and reduced unplanned downtime considerably.

A major decrease in every measurable type of nuclear related incident can be seen in the years following the accident. Also, the severity of incidents decreased. The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission fact sheet on plant safety performance shows that the number of significant events, safety system actuations, and automatic scrams while critical have all dropped to about 10% of their 1985 values. While these improvements are great, they do not reduce the possibility of Fukushima type accidents. The Three Mile Island accident was caused by equipment malfunction and exaggerated by human error, on the other hand, the Fukushima accident was caused by a 9.0 earthquake and the resulting tsunami.

What Three mile island did for plant safety, Fukushima will do for severe accident consequences.

Due to the 2011 Tohoku earthquake and tsunami, at least ten nuclear reactors experienced beyond design basis events. Three of the reactors were not running at the time and the other seven automatically scrammed due to the earthquake. The earthquake exceeded the design basis of three reactors and the tsunami exceeded the design basis of all ten. Two reactors, which were operating at the time, experienced both a beyond design basis earthquake and a beyond design basis tsunami. Three of the reactors suffered at least a partial meltdown. One major difference between the Fukushima nuclear disaster and previous reactor problems is that the Fukushima disaster was initiated by an unplanned event.

The result of the Three Mile Island nuclear accident was to reduce the possibility of an accident due to an incident that occurs as a result of normal operation. Similarly, one result of the Fukushima nuclear disaster will be to reduce the consequences of a beyond design basis event. Regulators worldwide have started stress tests and are reviewing operating plants for safety in light of these events.

Results of the first safety reviews are now available. The observations found during these reviews will help to strengthen nuclear safety. Improvements to equipment, training, inspections, and procedures are being implemented. These actions will assure that in the future, the consequences of unplanned events at nuclear plants will be less than they were before.


[1] INTERNATIONAL NUCLEAR SAFETY ADVISORY GROUP, Safety Culture, Safety Series No. 75-INSAG-4, IAEA, Vienna (1991).

[2] http://resources.nei.org/documents/japan/FactSheet_US_Nuclear_Plant_Enhancements_4-4-11.pdf

Fact Sheet 2010 NEI Quiz