Nuke 101 - Educating Educators

Posted by Carrington Dillon On April - 15 - 2010

[Approx. Read Time: 5 minutes]

Local educators learn how a nuclear power control room works.

Local educators learn how a nuclear power control room works.

 

Exelon employees from the Braidwood Nuclear Generation Station outside of Chicago, Illinois recently changed the game when it comes to nuclear power advocacy in the United States.  Led by their North American Young Generation in Nuclear (NA-YGN) Chapter, Braidwood Generating Station has started a nuclear power education program called Nuke 101.

The program aims to educate 6th-12th grade teachers on nuclear power, in hopes that they will pass this knowledge on to their students–creating a more informed and educated generation of Americans when it comes to nuclear power.

Let’s hope that the Braidwood Generating Station NA-YGN Chapter continues this program into the future, and other NA-YGN Chapters can follow.  This is undoubtedly important to America’s nuclear energy future.

Teachers learn about nuclear energy during Nuke 101

By Jo Ann Hustis

BRACEVILLE – For Dr. Charles Birch, the nation’s pilot Nuke 101 program Saturday was almost a walk back in time with his late father.

“He was a maintenance electrician 41 years for Wisconsin Power, and so, as a kid, I had the chance to understand electrical power,” said Birch, instructor at Coal City Intermediate School and one of 16 area junior high and high school teachers participating in the instructional session, hands-on lab, and tour of the immensely secure Braidwood Generating Station.

“At that time, nuclear just began to become part of Wisconsin Electric Power, so this was a very personal experience for me. I couldn’t help but think of my father walking at my shoulder and saying, ‘Hey, this is something.’”

A first-of-its-kind educational opportunity in the U.S., Nuke 101 was the inspiration of Braidwood Station engineer Morgan Davis and the North American Young Generation in Nuclear chapter at the plant.

“Educating the educators,” station spokesman Neal Miller noted prior to taking the teachers through the giant concrete, two-unit generating station.

“The first time we’ve ever done this. We do plan on taking it to another level, learning what we can here to improve for the next time, and continue building on it.”

The pilot program’s goal was to teach teachers about nuclear power so they can take the information back to their students.

Most of the young engineering professionals at Braidwood Station started in nuclear science by chance. Davis, herself, was introduced to it by someone who invited her to tour a generating station.

“This is an opportunity for teachers to take the wealth of information (from Nuke 101) and pass it on to the younger generation,” Braidwood Site Vice President Amir Shahkarami noted.

Fran Ogden has taught chemistry classes at Seneca Township High School for many years.

All this time, she has lived with La Salle Generating Station in Brookfield Township practically in her backyard, but never visited a nuclear plant until Saturday.

“It’s something I wanted to learn about as much as I could to relay to the students,” Ogden said of her participation in Nuke 101. “We always try to help the students find a career, and this is definitely an area many of them could get involved in.”

When nuclear power came on the scene in 1972, there were 42 generating stations operating across the nation.

Today in the United States, there are 104 operating nuclear plants, supplying 20 percent of the power needed in the country, Shahkarami noted during the instructional portion of the session.

Worldwide, today, there are 439 operating nuclear reactors. Eighty percent of the power used in France is generated by nuclear plants.

Also, another 54 nuclear generating stations are under construction throughout the world today. South Korea alone has 20 operating nuclear plants and another six under construction. Taiwan is currently constructing one nuclear plant. The United Arab Emirates, Egypt, and Japan are considering building nuclear plants.

China is building from 12 to 15 reactors into each of its nuclear plants.

“That’s massive,” Shahkarami said.

The maximum number of reactors in any nuclear station in the U.S. is two.

In the 1970s, the U.S. had the technology for reprocessing spent nuclear fuel, but not today.

“France, Germany and Russia do have the technology,” Shahkarami noted. “They got it from us. But President Jimmy Carter said, in 1977, no to processing nuclear fuel.”

The United States’ biggest nuclear accident, at Three Mile Island, occurred in 1977. Six years later, the nation canceled construction of the 259 generating stations that were on order.

“Because they couldn’t control the cost of construction,” he said.

China is building a dozen nuclear plants at a time today. However, with the financial crisis in the United States , it doesn’t make sense to build nuclear plants here, Shahkarami said.

“But, how long can we depend on foreign power? We haven’t built a nuclear plant in the U.S. since the early 1980s,” he said.

The back end of the nuclear generating process is recycling. The country is looking for new ways of operating this process. Meanwhile, the nation is storing its spent fuel.

“Sometime, someone will come along with a viable idea for reprocessing spent fuel,” Shahkarami said.

In the United States today, there are two kinds of reactors – pressure and boiling water.

Fast-breeder reactors are not in use in the U.S. today. These are fast-neutron reactors designed to breed fuel by producing more fissile material than they consume.

“They are the type that eventually will reprocess nuclear fuel,” Shahkarami said.

He stressed the importance of spent nuclear fuel not getting into the hands of the unauthorized, especially terrorists.

“Because they can extract plutonium from it, and that’s what makes missiles,” he said.

Braidwood Station currently stores its nuclear waste in deepwater pools within the plant, and in dry cask storage on station property.

“Eventually the dry casks have to go somewhere,” Shahkarami said. “The latest reprocessing techniques eventually take the uranium and plutonium and burn them in the reactors.”

At the conclusion of the tour, Dr. Birch, a social science teacher, noted the Nuke 101 class should definitely be an annual offering to educators.

“We in education are educators for all disciplines, so I would want this to continue, and include grades K through 12,” he said.

“We have to recognize we teach students first, and then, in particular cases, a subject area. It’s a very important experience I think ought to be continued.”

Teachers in Nuke 101 learn that radiation is all around you - even in bananas

Teachers in Nuke 101 learn that radiation is all around you - even in bananas

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • TwitThis
  • YahooBuzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email

3 Responses to “Nuke 101 - Educating Educators”

  1. DocForesight says:

    Sounds like a valuable program for the local schools and the power station.

    Mr. Shahkarami, it would seem, needs to brush up on his communication skills: it DOES make sense to build nuclear power plants in the USA, just as it does in any part of the world; second, the spent nuclear fuel is a lousy source for weapons-grade material and takes a huge investment to up-blend it to HEU (reactor-grade material is 5% enriched while weapons-grade is over 80%) and SNF is closely guarded, that’s why there hasn’t been a terrorist nuke detonated even since the fall of the USSR; third, there are designs capable of ‘burning’ SNF - IFR and LFTR - that are not getting the attention they deserve.

    Reading a few of the notable nuclear blogs has taught me these basic facts in the past 12 months. And I am not a nuclear engineer.

  2. amw says:

    There are a couple mistakes in the article. It cites that TMI occurred in 1977, actually it was in 1979.

    And the part about there only being 2 reactors at any US nuclear site is also incorrect. There are 3 reactors at ONS (Oconee Nuclear Station) and there may be others.

  3. A. Howell says:

    I’m glad that Braidwood has been proactive in public outreach to make sure our educators have the correct background and information. It was amusing giving a talk at the high school I attended and having a science teacher inform me that nuclear plants are very dangerous and can explode. Only through education and the dissemination accurate scientific information can the public be aware of the benefits to society that our industry can offer.

    DocForesight,
    Ideally with a closed fuel cycle we would utilize the breeder reactors for actinide/waste mitigation. Plus, the goal Generation IV reactor is reduced waste and far more proliferation resistant fuel.

    amw,
    Correct and Palo Verde has 3 as well.

Leave a Reply

Fact Sheet 2010 NEI Quiz