[Approx. Read Time: 2 minutes]
I realize that Clean Energy Insight hasn’t come out and voiced our opinion on the Senate version of the Cap-and-Trade Bill, otherwise known as the Boxer-Kerry Bill. But don’t get your hopes up. Personally, some of us feel that it isn’t appropriate, sensible, or productive for a nuclear power advocacy website to come out in support of the entire bill since it has such a large scope. In fact, the Cap-and-Trade bill going through Congress is one of the largest bills in United States history.
So from now on, we will offer our opinions on the nuclear section of the bill, and at the moment we like what we see; however, currently the bill has nothing but a nuclear-friendly foundation with promises to build.
Mark Flanagan at NEI Nuclear Notes has been following the bill here and here. Mark has described the bill as a “Christmas tree without ornaments” with regard to nuclear energy policy, and we agree. Hopefully, those ornaments will decorate our tree with:
- More Loan Guarantees
- Tax breaks for nuclear job creation, manufacturing, and construction
- Licensing process changes that reduce time and create an efficient process
- Action to get the ball rolling on this “blue-ribbon commission” that will re-examine options for nuclear fuel
Currently, Senators Lindsey Graham and John McCain have been offering strong criticism of the bill when it comes to nuclear power. To me, this seems more like political posturing and gamesmanship than anything. Although, I appreciate their aggressiveness in support of nuclear power, both Senators know that additions to the bill are coming. If positive additions promised by Sen. Kerry don’t come, then they can open up the flood gates of constructive criticism.
Although it seems to be unpopular in America today, if you actually read the current bill here (beginning on page 107), you will see that the Boxer-Kerry Bill actually opens up to nuclear power a lot more than the House version (Waxman-Markey). And when I say “open up,” I mean that it takes a big step in openly acknowledging that nuclear power will have to be a part of America’s energy solution.
On a more personal note, I am very pleased to see the focus on nuclear job creation in the bill. Especially with respect to trade jobs such as skilled craftsmen, welders, etc.– a big issue for the nuclear industry as current nuclear tradesmen present an aging workforce. Even if it is obvious that this comes simply as a result of Senators Boxer and Kerry fulfilling their legislative favors for the trade Unions.
We will see what happens with respect to nuclear power in the coming days. Each of you can make a difference by calling, emailing, or writing your Senator and telling them that you support nuclear power’s role in America’s energy future. Make them accountable for delivering those ornaments for our Nuclear power Christmas tree.












Excellent article. If they are going to force this massive legislation with who knows what in it on all of us the least we can get out of it is some positive overtures toward nuclear. These opportunities are rare and it is essential that nuclear energy be included in the nation’s future energy plans every time the opportunity exists.
[...] you are probably already aware, Senators Kerry and Boxer are currently working with their colleagues on the Senate version of the [...]
[...] the final legislation must be more pro-nuclear. This is currently being seen with the Boxer-Kerry legislation making its way through the Senate, although Waxman-Markey wasn’t as openly [...]